The butler scene has been replaced in an interesting was as well because Harry now is getting convinced by looking at the broken picture with his former best friends. Moreover, Peter appears more arrogant here (instead of being some depressed emo dude). Peter's conflict with Harry is being shown a little later in the Editor's Cut. Ditcovich, the subsequent conversation with Ursula during which Peter is in a different mood appears different and that is not just because Peter's apology regarding his behavior is shorter now. How Peter is more and more drawn to the black suit that causes Eddie Brocks getting laid off which is why he becomes Venom in the first place is different here resp. Which brings me to the following aspect: There are several recuts and scenes with alternate footage, especially in the middle of the movie. Furthermore, there is a little less footage of "Emo Peter" in the Editor's Cut in keeping with numerous alterations during the entire sequence. Certainly, one might argue there but at the end of the day, it only enhances the storyline resp. This has dramaturgical consequences because it now perfectly illustrates that the two main characters act on their own. However, the the most noticeable difference is probably Aunt May giving Peter a pep talk and Harry's butler who convinces him to help Peter after all in the Theatrical Version. Ditkovich in the hallway is completely missing. A few scenes are shorter now and on top of that, the scene with Mr. So, I guess the million dollar question is: What are the differences of the Editor's Cut?Īs already mentioned, the Editor's Cut is a bit shorter which also explains the absence of some scenes from the Theatrical Version. This goes for the bonus features as well. In addition to that, further audio tracks and subtitles are available for the Editor's Cut of the final installment (e.g. So far, the US Limited Edition Blu-ray box set is the only release worldwide that contains the new cut and any fan should consider getting it because not only are the discs region free (ABC) but the box set also contains both versions of the second installment. Even though there has never been an official statement, the flames of speculation regarding the Limited Edition box set were fueled.īeing released on, speculations became a fact: Apart from lots of bonus features, disc 4 of the box set does contain the new Editor's Cut. Almost two weeks before (!) the release of the new Limited Edition box set, the Editor's Cut had been available via stream on for a brief period and then removed quickly ( as reported by us). But then again, if that was true, the marketing department screwed up royally because the Editor's Cut has never been announced. Certainly, there is the The Amazing Spider-Man series but odds are that with Spider-Man: Homecoming being shown in theaters, the distributor wanted to cash in with a new cut of Spider-Man 3. When Spider-Man 3 was released theatrically, an Extended Cut of the second installment called Spider-Man 2.1 was released for home theaters. But before I will go into detail, I would like to explain a few more things regarding the so-called Editor's Cut. 1.5 minutes shorter than the Theatrical Version which insinuates rather uncommon alterations. And the fact of the matter is that this new cut is approx. The new cut is called Editor's Cut and it mostly traces back to cutter Bob Murawski who got an Oscar for The Hurt Locker by the way. Some of the critized issues back then have been kept in mind during the editing process. As a result, the score by Christopher Young was edited.Īnd now, 10 years later, a new cut of Spider-Man 3 sees the light of day. As for the score, it was already confusing back then that Danny Elfman was on board even though he allegedly refused due to creative differences during the second installment. Raimi himself wanted Vulture as villain and rumor had it that Vulture would be played by Ben Kingsley. The reason for that is simple: Raimi was urged to use the Venom character by the producers. It is still a Raimi but it can't keep with the previous ones: Putting the goofy scenes aside, the main point of criticism is the character Venom. Despite an incredible box office result of $891 million, fans and critics were not fully satisfied. In 2007, Sam Raimi's final installment of his Spider-Man trilogy was released.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |